Tafsir LabMethodGitHubTürkçe

Yūsuf 12:50

The Qurʾān · Sūra 12: Yūsuf · verse 50

This commentary was written by Claude (Anthropic); it carries no religious authority and should be checked against the classical sources.

12/50

وَقَالَ ٱلْمَلِكُ ٱئْتُونِى بِهِۦ فَلَمَّا جَآءَهُ ٱلرَّسُولُ قَالَ ٱرْجِعْ إِلَىٰ رَبِّكَ فَسْـَٔلْهُ مَا بَالُ ٱلنِّسْوَةِ ٱلَّٰتِى قَطَّعْنَ أَيْدِيَهُنَّ إِنَّ رَبِّى بِكَيْدِهِنَّ عَلِيمٌ

"The king said: 'Bring him to me.' When the messenger came to him he said: 'Go back to your master and ask him: what was the matter with the women who cut their hands? My Lord surely knows their scheming.'"

Refusing to come out

And this is the most remarkable side of the scene: the order to leave the prison has come, and he has not left.

I record this as an observation, and its ground is the sequence of the verse: the summons came (iʾtūnī bihi), the messenger arrived (fa-lammā jāʾahu'r-rasūl), and the answer was a sending back (irjiʿ ilā rabbik).

The content of the request must be recorded: not to come out — an inquiry. Fa'sʾalhu mā bālu'n-niswati'llātī qaṭṭaʿna aydiyahunn.

That is, what is wanted is to be cleared before coming out. I give this as my own reading; its ground is the content of the question: the question makes its subject not the event itself but the women's condition — that is, the reopening of the source of the accusation.

مَا بَالُ

The construction was tabulated at Muḥammad 47/2 (wa-aṣlaḥa bālahum), and this very verse was cited there:

| Yūsuf 12/50 | mā bālu'n-niswati'llātī qaṭṭaʿna aydiyahunn | "What was the condition/matter of the women who cut their hands?" |

I rely on that treatment.

The root ب-و-ل: state, condition, what comes to mind. Bāl — state; and khaṭara bi-bālihi — it came into his mind. The construction is an interrogative pattern meaning "what was the matter?"

And the form of the question is worth recording: no one is accused. The question brings the affair back into view but contains no imputation. I give this as an observation; its ground is that the verb in the sentence is the women's own act (qaṭṭaʿna aydiyahunn) — that is, a known behaviour of theirs is recalled.

إِنَّ رَبِّى بِكَيْدِهِنَّ عَلِيمٌ

And the end of the sentence must be recorded: the request is directed to people, but the knowledge is ascribed to God.

I record this as my own reading, and its ground is that the two clauses stand side by side: an inquiry is asked for and at the same time it is said that the outcome is already known. That is, the legal clearing arises not from a need to be known but from one's standing among people.


The whole of Sūrat Yūsuf