Tafsir LabMethodGitHubTürkçe

al-Muʾminūn 23:115

The Qurʾān · Sūra 23: al-Muʾminūn · verse 115

This commentary was written by Claude (Anthropic); it carries no religious authority and should be checked against the classical sources.

23/115

أَفَحَسِبْتُمْ أَنَّمَا خَلَقْنَٰكُمْ عَبَثًا وَأَنَّكُمْ إِلَيْنَا لَا تُرْجَعُونَ

a-fa-ḥasibtum annamā khalaqnākum ʿabathan wa annakum ilaynā lā turjaʿūn

"Did you suppose that We created you in vain, and that you would not be returned to Us?"

عَبَثًا — root: ع-ب-ث

The concrete sense of the root is given by the lexicographers as follows: to meddle with a thing aimlessly, to keep fiddling with it by hand. ʿAbitha bi-shayʾ — he played idly with a thing, he fiddled with it. And from this ʿabath — a work attached to no purpose.

The root is worked out here for the first time in this series. The word occurs in two places in the Qurʾān: al-Shuʿarāʾ 26/128 (a-tabnūna bi-kulli rīʿin āyatan taʿbathūn) and this verse.

عَبَث and لَعِب — the distinction

And this verse must be compared with another word treated across this series.

It was treated in detail at al-Dukhān 44/38 (wa mā khalaqnā'l-samāwāti wa'l-arḍa wa mā baynahumā lāʿibīn). What was recorded there:

The sentence does not say "We did not create." Mā khalaqnā … lāʿibīn — what is negated is not the act but the state of the act.

And in al-Dukhān it was given as an entry about the wording that the same sentence occurs at al-Anbiyāʾ 21/16 as well; that verse was treated at al-Anbiyāʾ 21/16-18. I rely on both.

The two words can be compared, and the lexicographers record a difference between them:

WordRootThe difference the lexicographers give
لَعِبل-ع-بPlay — it has a purpose (pleasure, amusement), but it is not serious
عَبَثع-ب-ثIdle doingit has no purpose at all

I pass this distinction on as it is transmitted.

And three verses can be set side by side:

PlaceThe state negatedThe objectAbout whom
al-Dukhān 44/38lāʿibīn — as those playingThe heavens and the earthThe Creatormā khalaqnā
al-Anbiyāʾ 21/16lāʿibīnSky, earth and what is betweenThe Creator
al-Muʾminūn 23/115ʿabathan — in vainYou — the human beingThe addressee's suppositiona-fa-ḥasibtum

I record the difference among the three verses as my own reading, its ground being the table above:

One. A difference of object. al-Dukhān and al-Anbiyāʾ name the universe; al-Muʾminūn names the addressee directlykhalaqnākum.

Two. A difference of mood. The others are statements (We did not create); al-Muʾminūn is a question (did you suppose).

Three. A difference of word. In the others laʿib (play), here ʿabath (idle doing). And by the distinction the lexicographers record, ʿabath is the heavier: in play there is an aim, in ʿabath there is none at all.

Four — and this is worth recording: al-Dukhān and al-Anbiyāʾ negate a state of the Creator; al-Muʾminūn asks about the condition of what is created. Khalaqnākum ʿabathan — "you, in vain". The question, that is, is about the meaning of the human being's own existence.

أَفَحَسِبْتُمْ — the return to the fifty-fifth verse

The root ح-س-ب occurs three times in the sūra, and this can be verified from the text:

VerseSentenceWhat is supposed
55a-yaḥsabūna annamā numidduhum bihī min mālin wa banīn…That what is given is a favour
115a-fa-ḥasibtum annamā khalaqnākum ʿabathāThat the creation is in vain
117fa-innamā ḥisābuhū ʿinda rabbihThe reckoning — the root in its noun form

And the two questions are built on the same pattern: annamā + a verb. The sūra, that is, questions two great suppositions in the same language: one about what is given within life, the other about life itself.

I record this as my own reading, its ground being this shared pattern.

وَأَنَّكُمْ إِلَيْنَا لَا تُرْجَعُونَ — the return to the ninety-ninth verse

The root ر-ج-ع occurred in the ninety-ninth verse: rabbi'rjiʿūn — "send me back."

VerseSentenceWho asks / what is said
99rabbi'rjiʿūnThey ask to return to the world
115ilaynā lā turjaʿūnThey suppose they will not be returned to Us
60annahum ilā rabbihim rājiʿūnWhat the believers know — that they are returning to their Lord

All three occurrences can be verified from the text. And I record this as my own reading, its ground being this threefold distribution:

In the sixtieth verse the return is a piece of knowledge that makes hearts tremble. In the hundred and fifteenth the denial of that same return is put as a supposition. And in the ninety-ninth the return is what is at last asked for and not given.

The same root, that is, in three different conditions in the sūra: known, denied, requested.

And the word order must be recorded: ilaynā has been brought forward (taqdīm) — "to Us — that you would not be returned". The emphasis is on to whom the return is.


The whole of Sūrat al-Muʾminūn