Tafsir LabMethodGitHubTürkçe

al-Māʾida 5:44-47

The Qurʾān · Sūra 5: al-Māʾida · verses 44-47

This commentary was written by Claude (Anthropic); it carries no religious authority and should be checked against the classical sources.

5/44-47

إِنَّآ أَنزَلْنَا ٱلتَّوْرَىٰةَ فِيهَا هُدًى وَنُورٌ … وَمَن لَّمْ يَحْكُم بِمَآ أَنزَلَ ٱللَّهُ فَأُو۟لَٰٓئِكَ هُمُ ٱلْكَٰفِرُونَ

In three verses the same sentence is repeated with three different endings, and this repetition is one of the most discussed places in the sūra.

VerseContextThe close
44The Torah — the prophets, the rabbis and the scholars judged by itFa-ulāʾika humu'l-kāfirūn
45The verses of retaliation — a life for a life, an eye for an eyeFa-ulāʾika humu'ẓ-ẓālimūn
47Let the people of the Gospel judge by what was sent down to themFa-ulāʾika humu'l-fāsiqūn

The disagreement among the exegetes — not concealed

ViewContent
AAll three words belong to the same group, and the repetition is for emphasis
BThe three words indicate three distinct degrees — denial, wrongdoing, departing from the way
COne who abandons the ruling by denying it is distinguished from one who abandons it while accepting it, following his own desire; the first falls under the first word, the second under the others
DRestricting the verses to their own context (the People of the Book's not judging by the Book in their hands)

No preference is adopted in this commentary, no ruling is issued, and no attribute is assigned to any person or community by these verses. Per the method (Method): a verse describes an attribute; determining who falls under that attribute is not this commentary's business.

But there are three notes that can be verified from the text, and they should be recorded:

NoteWhere
Each of the three verses addresses, in context, the people of a different book44 (the Torah), 45 (retaliation in the Torah), 47 (the Gospel)
The closing words are differentKāfirūn / ẓālimūn / fāsiqūn
In the middle of the three verses stands a call to pardon45: fa-man taṣaddaqa bihī fa-huwa kaffāratun lah

وَكَتَبْنَا عَلَيْهِمْ فِيهَآ أَنَّ ٱلنَّفْسَ بِٱلنَّفْسِ (45)

Five pairings are counted: nafs–nafs, ʿayn–ʿayn, anf–anf, udhun–udhun, sinn–sinnand a sixth, al-jurūḥu qiṣāṣ.

I record this as an observation about the language: the sentence is built with the preposition بan-nafsa bi'n-nafs — and this preposition conveys requital, an equivalent. That is, the list is a list of equivalences; not an encouragement but an upper limit.

And immediately after: fa-man taṣaddaqa bihī fa-huwa kaffāratun lah — "whoever remits it as charity, it is an expiation for him".

The same structure was treated at al-Baqara 2/178 (fa-man ʿufiya lahū min akhīhi shayʾun fa'ttibāʿun bi'l-maʿrūf); I rely on that treatment. Both verses fix the requital and then immediately bring pardon to the front.

وَقَفَّيْنَا عَلَىٰٓ ءَاثَٰرِهِم بِعِيسَى ٱبْنِ مَرْيَمَ (46)

Taqfiya (ق-ف-و): to follow behind someone, in his tracks; qafā — the nape of the neck. That is, "We sent one after another behind them".

And the Gospel is qualified by the same two words: fīhi hudan wa nūr — the same phrase used of the Torah at 44. This repetition can be verified from the text.


The whole of Sūrat al-Māʾida