Tafsir LabMethodGitHubTürkçe

Hūd 11:69

The Qurʾān · Sūra 11: Hūd · verse 69

This commentary was written by Claude (Anthropic); it carries no religious authority and should be checked against the classical sources.

11/69

وَلَقَدْ جَآءَتْ رُسُلُنَآ إِبْرَٰهِيمَ بِٱلْبُشْرَىٰ قَالُوا۟ سَلَٰمًا قَالَ سَلَٰمٌ فَمَا لَبِثَ أَن جَآءَ بِعِجْلٍ حَنِيذٍ

wa laqad jāʾat rusulunā Ibrāhīma bi'l-bushrā, qālū salāman, qāla salām, fa-mā labitha an jāʾa bi-ʿijlin ḥanīdh

"Our messengers came to Abraham with the good news. They said 'Peace'; he said 'Peace', and without delay he brought a roasted calf."

Two tellings of the scene — a comparison with al-Dhāriyāt

This scene was treated in detail at al-Dhāriyāt 51/24-30, and I rely on that treatment without reservation. In summary, the entries there were these:

The concrete sense of the root ض-ي-ف: to incline to one side, to draw near, to join. Ḍayf — "one who draws near, who joins". A guest is not one who enters the house from outside but one who is added to the house. In the exchange of greetings the two sides do not say the same word: the guests say salāman (accusative — a verbal clause, coming to be), Abraham says salāmun (nominative — a nominal sentence, fixity). Abraham returns the greeting given to him in a more lasting pattern. رَاغَ — "to withdraw to one side quietly, without being noticed". The verse does not say "he went". سَمِين — "fat". Abraham slaughters the best of the flock for three travellers he does not know. The question a-lā taʾkulūn and the gravity of refusing food as a sign in the Arab custom of hospitality.

And in al-Dhāriyāt this verse (Hūd 11/69) was already cited: "The telling in another sūra of the Qurʾān adds one detail: 'without delay he brought a roasted calf' — the note mā labitha (he did not delay) there is consistent with the speed the fāʾ conjunctions give here."

I now compare the two tellings as a table. All the rows are data of the text:

Elemental-Dhāriyāt 51/24-30Hūd 11/69-73
Openinghal atāka ḥadīthu ḍayfi Ibrāhīma'l-mukramīn — the form of a questionwa laqad jāʾat rusulunā Ibrāhīma bi'l-bushrā — a statement
What the comers are calledḍayf — "guests"rusulunā — "Our messengers"
The reason for the visitNot stated at the outset — disclosed in verse 32bi'l-bushrāstated from the start
The greetingqālū salāman · qāla salāmqālū salāman · qāla salāmword for word the same
The first reactionqawmun munkarūn — "a people not known"Absent
The verb of withdrawingfa-rāgha ilā ahlih — he slipped away quietlyAbsent
The adjective of the calfsamīn — fatḥanīdh — roasted
The note of speedThe fa- conjunctionsfa-mā labitha — "he did not delay"
The verb of offeringfa-qarrabahū ilayhim + a-lā taʾkulūnAbsent — straight to the noticing
The noticingfa-awjasa minhum khīfanakirahum wa awjasa minhum khīfa
The wife's reactionfa-aqbalati'mraʾatuhū fī ṣarratin fa-ṣakkat wajhahā — she came with a cry and struck her facefa-ḍaḥikat — she laughed
The content of the good newsbi-ghulāmin ʿalīmbi-Isḥāq wa min warāʾi Isḥāqa Yaʿqūb
The going to Lot32-37 — in detail74-83 — in greater detail

Three data points emerge from the table and must be recorded:

One — the two sūras open up different parts of the same scene. al-Dhāriyāt gives detail on the manners of hospitality (slipping out quietly, the fatness, the offering, "will you not eat?"). Hūd compresses the hospitality into a single sentence and moves on to the good news and to Lot.

Two — Hūd names the comers rusulunā from the start; al-Dhāriyāt says ḍayf. Hūd, that is, gives the reader the information from the outset, and al-Dhāriyāt does not.

Three — the content of the good news is given differently. al-Dhāriyāt states an attribute (ʿalīm — knowing); Hūd states two names: Isaac (Isḥāq) and Jacob (Yaʿqūb).

I record this as my own reading, and its ground is the table above: the two tellings do not conflict — they are two different frames on the same scene. The frame of al-Dhāriyāt is the receiving of guests, the frame of Hūd is the continuation of the line and the deliverance of Lot. This also suits the whole of each sūra: Hūd is a sequence of narratives, and the links of the sequence are being tied to one another.

حَنِيذ — the word worked out

The root ح-ن-ذ. The root occurs here for the first time in this series, and in the Qurʾān it is found only in this verse.

The sense the lexicographers give: ḥanīdh — meat cooked on hot stones, or in a pit with fire beneath it. Some of the lexicographers explain it as "cooked so well that it drips"; others say "roasted on stone".

ExplanationWhat it says
1Meat cooked in a pit with heated stones
2Well roasted meat, dripping with its own fat
3Roasted whole

All three are passed on as ascribed to the lexicographers; I do not impose a preference.

And what the word adds to the verse must be recorded: samīn (al-Dhāriyāt) reported the quality of the animal; ḥanīdh reports the manner of the cooking. The two sūras give two different details of the same act of hospitality.

فَمَا لَبِثَ — not delaying

The root ل-ب-ث: to stay in a place, to linger, to wait. The root was treated at al-Kahf 18/12 and 18/25 (labithū).

And the construction of the sentence must be recorded: fa-mā labitha an jāʾa — "he did not delay in bringing it".

I record this as an observation about the word order: the verse makes the measure not the size of the hospitality but its speed. And in al-Dhāriyāt this was conveyed by three fāʾ conjunctions. The two sūras say the same thing by two different means of language.


Roots analysed in this section

ض-ي-ف

The whole of Sūrat Hūd