Tafsir LabMethodGitHubTürkçe

al-Isrāʾ 17:83-84

The Qurʾān · Sūra 17: al-Isrāʾ · verses 83-84

This commentary was written by Claude (Anthropic); it carries no religious authority and should be checked against the classical sources.

17/83-84

وَإِذَآ أَنْعَمْنَا عَلَى ٱلْإِنسَٰنِ أَعْرَضَ وَنَـَٔا بِجَانِبِهِ

Wa idhā anʿamnā ʿala'l-insāni aʿraḍa wa naʾā bi-jānibih, wa idhā massahu'l-sharru kāna yaʾūsā · Qul kullun yaʿmalu ʿalā shākilatihi fa-rabbukum aʿlamu biman huwa ahdā sabīlā

"When We bestow favour on man, he turns away and draws his side aside; and when evil touches him, he falls into despair. Say: 'Each acts after his own fashion. Your Lord knows best who is better guided on the way.'"

نَـَٔا بِجَانِبِهِ

The root ن-أ-ي: to go far off. Jānib — the side, the flank.

The concrete picture of the idiom must be recorded: "he removed his side" — that is, he turned his shoulder, he turned his back. In Arabic this describes a going away in pride.

The same idiom occurs at 41/51 in Fuṣṣilat (wa idhā anʿamnā ʿala'l-insāni aʿraḍa wa naʾā bi-jānibih) — the two verses are word for word the same. It was treated there, and I rely on that treatment.

And the continuations of the two verses differ:

PlaceWhen evil touches him
Fuṣṣilat 41/51Fa-dhū duʿāʾin ʿarīḍhe prays at great length
al-Isrāʾ 17/83Kāna yaʾūsāhe falls into despair

The same opening, two different continuations. I record this as an observation: the two verses record two different reactions of the same human being — one a pleading, the other a cutting off of hope. Both at a moment of hardship.

يَـُٔوس — root ي-أ-س: to cut off hope. An intensive form.

And the forbidding of despair was treated at 39/53 in al-Zumar (lā taqnaṭū min raḥmati'llāh). I rely on that treatment: the state described here is the state forbidden there.

17/84 — شَاكِلَة

The root ش-ك-ل: to resemble; and to tie (shikāl — the hobble put on an animal's leg). Shākila is explained by the lexicographers in two ways:

ReadingWhat shākila is
1A way, a direction — the road he keeps to
2Constitution, disposition, temperament — his own fashion

Both readings are transmitted; I do not impose a preference.

But what the two readings share can be recorded, and I give this as an observation: the word speaks of something that belongs to the person himself. And the continuation of the verse does not make this into a sentence of judgement — it leaves the knowing to God: fa-rabbukum aʿlamu biman huwa ahdā sabīlā.

This is a link on the line of responsibility tabulated in the backbone of the sūra. And it must be recorded, per the method: the verse does not leave to man the knowledge of who is on the right way. This is a sentence that closes off judging about another.


Roots analysed in this section

ي-أ-س

The whole of Sūrat al-Isrāʾ