Tafsir LabMethodGitHubTürkçe

al-Anbiyāʾ 21:45-46

The Qurʾān · Sūra 21: al-Anbiyāʾ · verses 45-46

This commentary was written by Claude (Anthropic); it carries no religious authority and should be checked against the classical sources.

21/45-46

قُلْ إِنَّمَآ أُنذِرُكُم بِٱلْوَحْىِ وَلَا يَسْمَعُ ٱلصُّمُّ ٱلدُّعَآءَ إِذَا مَا يُنذَرُونَ · وَلَئِن مَّسَّتْهُمْ نَفْحَةٌ مِّنْ عَذَابِ رَبِّكَ لَيَقُولُنَّ يَٰوَيْلَنَآ إِنَّا كُنَّا ظَٰلِمِينَ

Qul innamā undhirukum bi'l-waḥy, wa lā yasmaʿu'ṣ-ṣummu'd-duʿāʾa idhā mā yundharūn · Wa la-in massathum nafḥatun min ʿadhābi rabbika la-yaqūlunna yā waylanā innā kunnā ẓālimīn

"Say: 'I warn you only by revelation.' But the deaf do not hear the call when they are warned. · And if a breath of your Lord's punishment were to touch them, they would surely say: 'Woe to us! We were indeed doing wrong.'"

إِنَّمَآ أُنذِرُكُم بِٱلْوَحْىِ — the setting of a limit

Innamā is the particle of restriction: "only, nothing but". And what is restricted is the instrument of the warning: bi'l-waḥy.

I record this as my own reading, its ground being the fifth verse: there the addressees had asked for an āya — a visible sign. Here the answer is given: the only thing in my hands is revelation. That is, the verse also says what the instrument in the messenger's hand is not.

At al-Furqān on 25/56 and at Sabaʾ on 34/28 the scope of the messengership was given with two different words; this verse gives its instrument. The three will be tabulated at the hundred and seventh verse.

وَلَا يَسْمَعُ ٱلصُّمُّ ٱلدُّعَآءَ — the counterpart of this sentence was treated at al-Rūm on 30/52: fa-innaka lā tusmiʿu'l-mawtā wa lā tusmiʿu'ṣ-ṣumma'd-duʿāʾ. I rely on that treatment.

And the grammatical difference between the two verses must be recorded:

al-Rūm 30/52al-Anbiyāʾ 21/45
The verbtusmiʿu — Form IV: you cannot make them hearyasmaʿu — Form I: they do not hear
The subjectThe ProphetThe deaf
What it saysThe limit of the messenger's powerThe consequence of the addressee's state

The same fact, from two different sides. I record this as an observation about the pattern.

نَفْحَةٌ — a threefold diminishing

And the forty-sixth verse is one of the finest pieces of word order in the sūra. Three separate diminishings come one upon another in the sentence:

ElementRootWhat it diminishes
massatم-س-سTo touch — not to strike but to graze
nafḥatunن-ف-حA breath — a slight stirring of scent or of wind
min ʿadhābiMin partitive: a part of the punishment

Nafḥa — root ن-ف-ح: to blow lightly, for a scent to spread. Nafaḥa'ṭ-ṭīb — the perfume spread. And the word carries a tāʾ (nafḥa, not nafḥ): in Arabic the tāʾ of unity conveys a single instance — "one single breath".

So the sentence says this: were a single breath of a part of the punishment to graze them.

And what they will say in return is given: yā waylanā innā kunnā ẓālimīnthe very sentence spoken by the town destroyed in the fourteenth verse.

I record this as my own reading, its ground being that the two sentences are word for word the same: the forty-sixth verse repeats hypothetically and on the smallest scale what in the fourteenth verse actually happened. That is, the sūra shows this: the lightest touch produces the same sentence as the gravest destruction.

The lightness of the root م-س-س was recorded at Ṣād on 38/41: "what distinguishes the word is its lightness: mass is to touch a thing — not to strike, not to hit." I rely on that treatment. And the same verb will be used of Job in the eighty-third verse of this sūra: massaniya'ḍ-ḍurr.


The whole of Sūrat al-Anbiyāʾ