Tafsir LabMethodGitHubTürkçe

al-Sajda 32:30

The Qurʾān · Sūra 32: al-Sajda · verse 30

This commentary was written by Claude (Anthropic); it carries no religious authority and should be checked against the classical sources.

32/30

فَأَعْرِضْ عَنْهُمْ وَٱنتَظِرْ إِنَّهُم مُّنتَظِرُونَ

Fa-aʿriḍ ʿanhum wa'ntaẓir innahum muntaẓirūn

"So turn away from them and wait; they too are waiting."

The close of the sūra

Three words, two commands and a statement.

فَأَعْرِضْ عَنْهُمْ — root ع-ر-ض: breadth, width; and from this iʿrāḍto turn side on, to turn the breadth of the face away. The root was treated in Fuṣṣilat 41/4 (fa-aʿraḍa aktharuhum) and 41/51 (naʾā bi-jānibih). I do not repeat it here.

And there is a reversal worth recording: in Fuṣṣilat iʿrāḍ was the act of the other side. Here the same verb is commanded to the one addressed. The same root, in two directions: one a turning away from the text, the other a turning away from the one who turns away.

A note per the method (Method): from this I draw no ruling of estrangement or of wholesale abandonment. The context of the sentence is plain: in the twenty-eighth verse a date was asked for, and in the twenty-ninth an answer was given. Iʿrāḍ is the not-continuing of the argument.

وَٱنتَظِرْ إِنَّهُم مُّنتَظِرُونَ — a comparison with al-Dukhān

In al-Dukhān 44/59 the close of that sūra was built with the same structure, and this verse was already mentioned there. I rely on that treatment and carry the comparison over here, to its own place:

SūraCloseRoot
al-Dukhān 44/59Fa'rtaqib innahum murtaqibūnر-ق-ب
al-Sajda 32/30Fa-aʿriḍ ʿanhum wa'ntaẓir innahum muntaẓirūnن-ظ-ر

The difference between the two roots was tabulated in al-Dukhān, and its summary was this:

RootCoreWhat it states
ن-ظ-رTo lookLooking; and in Form IV, to grant a respite
ر-ق-بTo watch out forTo watch a thing so as not to miss it; raqaba — the neck

Two differences belong here, and both are verifiable:

One. In the close of al-Sajda there is one command more: fa-aʿriḍ ʿanhum. Al-Dukhān passes straight to the waiting; al-Sajda commands first a breaking off and then a waiting. The two verbs set up a sequence: first withdrawal from the argument, then waiting.

Two. The choice of root fits the sūra's own words. In the twenty-ninth verse wa lā hum yunẓarūn had occurred — the same root, in the sense "no respite is granted".

VerseWordPatternMeaning
29YunẓarūnForm IV, passiveNo respite is granted
30IntaẓirForm VIII, imperativeWait
30MuntaẓirūnForm VIII, active participleThose who wait

The same root, three times in two verses. I record this as my own reading, and its ground is this threefold repetition: the twenty-ninth verse says that there is no respite; the thirtieth commands waiting. That is, the sūra commands not a waiting without an end but a waiting whose end has been stated. The length of the waiting is not known; what will happen when it ends is known.

And the observation recorded in al-Dukhān works here too: the sentence does not say "you wait, and they will be destroyed". It joins both sides in the same verbmuntaẓirūn, the plural active participle of the same form. The difference will appear not in the act but at the end of the act.


Roots analysed in this section

ن-ظ-رس-و-يع-ر-ضق-ر-رر-ج-عر-ق-بل-ق-يي-ق-نأ-و-ي

The whole of Sūrat al-Sajda