Tafsir LabMethodGitHubTürkçe

al-Zumar 39:56-66

The Qurʾān · Sūra 39: al-Zumar · verses 56-66

This commentary was written by Claude (Anthropic); it carries no religious authority and should be checked against the classical sources.

39/56-66

أَن تَقُولَ نَفْسٌ … أَوْ تَقُولَ لَوْ أَنَّ ٱللَّهَ هَدَىٰنِى لَكُنتُ مِنَ ٱلْمُتَّقِينَ · أَوْ تَقُولَ حِينَ تَرَى ٱلْعَذَابَ لَوْ أَنَّ لِى كَرَّةً فَأَكُونَ مِنَ ٱلْمُحْسِنِينَ

"Before a soul says this… or says 'Had God guided me, I would have been among those who guard themselves'; or, when it sees the punishment, says 'Had I one more turn, I would be among those who do good'…"

Three excuses

The verses set out three separate sentences, and all three come in the pattern an taqūla nafsun / aw taqūla:

OrderSayingWhat it does
1 (56)Yā ḥasratā ʿalā mā farraṭtu fī janbi'llāhRegret
2 (57)Law anna'llāha hadānīTransfer of responsibility
3 (58)Law anna lī karratanThe wish to return

The order is worth recording, and I give it as my own reading: first regret, then the laying of the blame on another, then the demand to make good. And the second cuts off the third: had no guidance been given, returning too would have no meaning.

And the answer is given directly to the second excuse (59): balā qad jāʾatka āyātī fa-kadhdhabta bihā wa'stakbarta"No! My signs came to you, and you denied them and grew proud."

بَلَىٰ — in Arabic, the particle of answer used to refute a negative sentence. That is, the negative on which the excuse rests ("I was not guided") is rejected.

وَٱسْتَكْبَرْتَ — and the cause is named as self-magnification. That kibr lies beneath the dispute was treated in Ghāfir (al-Muʾmin) at 40/56; here the same root is set against the excuse.

قُلْ أَفَغَيْرَ ٱللَّهِ تَأْمُرُوٓنِّىٓ أَعْبُدُ أَيُّهَا ٱلْجَٰهِلُونَ

"Say: 'Is it other than God that you command me to serve, O you ignorant ones!'"

The verb must be recorded: taʾmurūnnī — "do you command me?" That is, what the other side is doing is named not as an offer but as a command.

وَلَقَدْ أُوحِىَ إِلَيْكَ وَإِلَى ٱلَّذِينَ مِن قَبْلِكَ لَئِنْ أَشْرَكْتَ لَيَحْبَطَنَّ عَمَلُكَthe root ح-ب-ط was analysed in al-Ḥujurāt at 49/2 (an animal that eats a harmful plant, swells and dies — growth on the outside, rot within). I do not repeat it here.

The addressee of the conditional sentence is worth recording: the ruling is given as directed to the prophets as well (wa ila'lladhīna min qablik). That is, the rule is laid down without exception.

بَلِ ٱللَّهَ فَٱعْبُدْ وَكُن مِّنَ ٱلشَّٰكِرِينَ — and in the word order the object is brought forward: Allāha fa'ʿbud — "serve God." In Arabic this fronting conveys restriction: and no other. The command mukhliṣan lahu'd-dīn in the second verse of the sūra is thereby repeated here by way of word order.


The whole of Sūrat al-Zumar