فَوَيْلٌ يَوْمَئِذٍ لِّلْمُكَذِّبِينَ ٱلَّذِينَ هُمْ فِى خَوْضٍ يَلْعَبُونَ
Fa-waylun yawmaʾidhin li'l-mukadhdhibīn · Alladhīna hum fī khawḍin yalʿabūn "So woe that day to those who call it a lie! Those who go on playing in a plunge."
| al-Mursalāt 77/15 (and nine times more) | al-Ṭūr 52/11 | |
|---|---|---|
| Text | وَيْلٌ يَوْمَئِذٍ لِّلْمُكَذِّبِينَ | فَوَيْلٌ يَوْمَئِذٍ لِّلْمُكَذِّبِينَ |
| Difference | — | There is a فَ at the head |
| How many times | Ten | One |
This sentence was treated in detail in the section on al-Mursalāt: the word wayl, the fronting of yawmaʾidhin, the pattern mukadhdhibīn and the function of the repetition were given in a table. And its identity with al-Muṭaffifīn 83/10 was recorded there too.
One — the work of the fāʾ. In al-Mursalāt the sentence had no connective; here there is a fāʾ at its head and this ties the sentence to the preceding one.
That is, the sentence is not an independent refrain; it is the consequence of the ninth and tenth verses (the sky heaves, the mountains walk). In English it is met with "and so, on that day".
Two — there is no repetition. In al-Mursalāt this sentence occurred ten times and divided the sūra. In al-Ṭūr it occurs once.
And this shows that the two sūras are built differently: al-Mursalāt was a text divided by a refrain; al-Ṭūr's division is made with something else — from the thirty-fifth verse onward, with the interrogative particle.
Root: خ-و-ض. This root was treated in the discussion of al-Muddaththir 74/45; I do not repeat it here. The summary of the finding there: the concrete sense of khawḍ is to walk into water stirring up its mud, and the conclusion recorded in al-Muddaththir was "an empty occupation carried on together". And this verse was already cited in the section on al-Muddaththir.
And at al-Dhāriyāt 51/11 a word from the same field was treated: ghamra (water's covering over). There the two words were compared in a table: khawḍ is to go into (active, the person does it himself), ghamra is to stay inside (a state, the person is covered over).
يَلْعَبُونَ — root ل-ع-ب: to play, to amuse oneself. Luʿb — play. The Qurʾān qualifies the life of this world with this word: "The life of this world is only play and diversion" (al-Anʿām 6/32; al-ʿAnkabūt 29/64).
| خَوْض | لَعِب | |
|---|---|---|
| What it states | The medium — what one is in | The act — what is being done |
| Its place in the grammar | Governed by fī — a vessel | Imperfect verb — continuance |
That is, the sentence says this: there is a medium (muddy water) and in that medium a work is being done (play).
And the definition of play is decisive here. Play is seriousness without an outcome: the player spends real effort, but the effort he spends has no return outside the game.
The finding recorded for the word lahw in the section on al-Takāthur looks at this: "the matter is not the doing of an evil but the fastening of attention somewhere else."
And the word sāhūn (heedless) at al-Dhāriyāt 51/11 was in the same field.
| Word | Place | What it says |
|---|---|---|
| لَهْو | al-Takāthur | Attention changing place |
| سَاهُون | al-Dhāriyāt 51/11, al-Māʿūn 107/5 | Attention not being there |
| خَوْض + لَعِب | al-Ṭūr 52/12, al-Muddaththir 74/45 | Attention being full of a work — but an empty one |
And the third is the hardest, because the person is occupied. A man standing idle can be told "you are standing idle"; a man playing cannot be — the man playing is working.
I record this as my own reading; the root meanings of the three words were given one by one in the relevant sections.
ٱلَّذِينَ هُمْ — a qualifying clause. This pattern was treated in the discussions of al-Māʿūn 107/5 and al-Maʿārij 70/22-34: the pronoun hum is not grammatically required; its addition is for specification and emphasis.
And the reason it is visible is that the description does not say "standing idle". Khawḍ is a movement, laʿb an occupation. Both consume time and attention; both tire.
What modern life produces most abundantly is exactly this: occupations that engage but do not accumulate. A person can read, watch, argue, write comments all day long — and at the end of the day may have nothing in hand. He has not been idle; but nothing has happened either.
And the real difficulty the verse records is this: a man standing idle knows he is standing idle. A man in a game does not, because the game looks serious — it has rules, it has a winner, it has excitement.
The diagnosis recorded for lahw in the section on al-Takāthur (attention changing place) and the one recorded for sāhūn at al-Dhāriyāt 51/11 (attention not being there) complete a series together with this third state: attention goes elsewhere, it is not there, and it fills with another work.
I record this as an application of the verse; the verse does not describe an age, it describes a state.