Tafsir LabMethodGitHubTürkçe

al-Wāqiʿa 56:95-96

The Qurʾān · Sūra 56: al-Wāqiʿa · verses 95-96

This commentary was written by Claude (Anthropic); it carries no religious authority and should be checked against the classical sources.

56/95-96

إِنَّ هَٰذَا لَهُوَ حَقُّ ٱلْيَقِينِ · فَسَبِّحْ بِٱسْمِ رَبِّكَ ٱلْعَظِيمِ

Inna hādhā la-huwa ḥaqqu'l-yaqīn · Fa-sabbiḥ bi'smi rabbika'l-ʿaẓīm

"This is surely the very truth of certainty. So glorify the name of your Lord, the Mighty."

Three emphases one upon another

There are three emphases in the sentence: inna + la + huwa (the pronoun of separation). In Arabic this heaping up means the closing of what is said to debate.

And this stands exactly over against the objection in the forty-seventh verse of the sūra: there a question was asked with two emphases, a-innā la-mabʿūthūn. Here the answer is given with three.

حَقُّ ٱلْيَقِين — and the degrees of certainty

Ḥaqq — root ح-ق-ق: what is fixed, what is in its proper place, the real. Yaqīn — root ي-ق-ن: the absence of any doubt.

In the Qurʾān the word yaqīn occurs in three separate constructions, and the three were treated earlier in the series:

ConstructionWhereFile
ʿIlma'l-yaqīnAl-Takāthur 102/5al-Takāthur
ʿAyna'l-yaqīnAl-Takāthur 102/7al-Takāthur
Ḥaqqu'l-yaqīnAl-Wāqiʿa 56/95 and al-Ḥāqqa 69/51al-Ḥāqqa

In the classical exegeses this triad is generally explained as a gradation: certainty by knowing, certainty by seeing, certainty by living through. I relay this explanation as one widespread in the tradition; it is not an ordering that follows necessarily from the wording of the constructions, and the lexicographers explain the genitive structure of the expression ḥaqqu'l-yaqīn differently as well.

Hādhā — "this". What it points to is not said. The most widespread reading in the classical exegeses is that it points to the whole of what the sūra has recounted.

فَسَبِّحْ بِٱسْمِ رَبِّكَ ٱلْعَظِيم — and the sūra closes

This verse is identical word for word with the seventy-fourth. The analysis of the words was made there; I do not repeat it.

The placing of the repetition must be recorded:

VerseAfter what
74After the four proofs from nature
96After the scene of death and the three ends

The same command, at the end of two separate sets of proof. In the section on the structure of the sūra I recorded that this repetition draws the boundaries of the blocks; here its function is completed.

And the close is worth recording: after ninety-six verses recounting the resurrection, the three classes, the Garden, the Fire, the proofs and death, the sūra asks of its hearer a single thing: glorification.

I give this as my own reading: what is asked is not a piece of knowledge, not even an act — it is an attitude. Sabbiḥ, by its root, is to hold apart: to declare God free of everything unbefitting Him. And what has been done throughout the sūra is exactly this: the striking out, one by one, of false suppositions about who can do what. The last command gives that striking-out its name.


Roots analysed in this section

ك-ر-مح-م-مس-ب-قن-ز-لد-ي-نف-ك-هك-ن-نو-ق-عن-ش-أر-و-ح

The whole of Sūrat al-Wāqiʿa