Tafsir LabMethodGitHubTürkçe

al-Taghābun 64:10

The Qurʾān · Sūra 64: al-Taghābun · verse 10

This commentary was written by Claude (Anthropic); it carries no religious authority and should be checked against the classical sources.

64/10

وَالَّذِينَ كَفَرُوا وَكَذَّبُوا بِآيَاتِنَا أُولَٰئِكَ أَصْحَابُ النَّارِ خَالِدِينَ فِيهَا وَبِئْسَ الْمَصِيرُ

Wa'lladhīna kafarū wa kadhdhabū bi-āyātinā ulāʾika aṣḥābu'l-nāri khālidīna fīhā, wa biʾsa'l-maṣīr

"And those who denied and cried lies to Our signs are the people of the Fire; they remain there. What an evil arrival!"

Two verbs: كَفَرُوا and كَذَّبُوا

The verse sets two verbs side by side and the two are not the same thing.

  • كَفَرُوا — they covered. An inward operation: closing over what one has seen.
  • كَذَّبُوا — they cried lies. An outward operation: saying "this is a lie".

This distinction was treated in al-Māʿūn and I do not repeat it: kadhaba (Form I) means "he told a lie" — the agent is a liar; kadhdhaba (Form II) means "he called another's true utterance a lie" — what he does is to reject what is true. And what was recorded there is this: takdhīb is not a silent denial but an active stance, a taking up of position.

And this connects with the second verse of the sūra: there only kāfirun had been said — a state. Here an act is added to the state.

أَصْحَابُ ٱلنَّارِ — "the people of the Fire"

Root: ص ح ب. Ṣaḥb is to be together, to keep company, to be found alongside. Ṣāḥib is a travelling companion; ṣuḥba is being together; aṣḥāb is its plural.

The Qurʾān uses this construct often: aṣḥābu'l-nār, aṣḥābu'l-janna, aṣḥābu'l-yamīn, aṣḥābu'l-shimāl, aṣḥābu'l-kahf, aṣḥābu'l-ukhdūd (treated in al-Burūj).

The choice of the word is striking. It does not say "those who enter the Fire" or "those who are in the Fire"; it says "the companions of the Fire". Inside the word ṣuḥba there is a continuity and a belonging: not a place one owns but a place one belongs to.

And a point recorded in al-Maʿārij bears on this place: in the root of the word ʿizīn too there is belonging — everyone has a group. Here too a group is being named: the person is not present in the Fire, he belongs to the Fire.

وَبِئْسَ ٱلْمَصِيرُ — a return to the third verse

بِئْسَ in Arabic is a fiʿl al-dhamm — a verb of dispraise. Its counterpart is niʿma (a verb of praise). Both are frozen verbs; they do not inflect.

And ٱلْمَصِير was the verse-ending of the third verse: wa ilayhi'l-maṣīr — "to Him is the coming home."

The sūra brings the same word back seven verses later, and this time places a verb of dispraise before it.

64/364/10
Expressionwa ilayhi'l-maṣīrwa biʾsa'l-maṣīr
What it saysTo whom the coming home isWhat the arrival is like
ScopeEveryoneSome
ToneNeutralDispraise

The meaning of this is: the address of the coming home and the character of the arrival are separate things. Everyone comes home to the same place; but not everyone meets the same thing.

This agrees with the picture the sūra has been building from the start. In the second verse people came out of a single creation and were divided into two groups; here they come out of a single homecoming and are divided into two outcomes. The structure is the same: a common beginning, a diverging outcome.


The whole of Sūrat al-Taghābun