Tafsir LabMethodGitHubTürkçe

al-Nabaʾ 78:36

The Qurʾān · Sūra 78: al-Nabaʾ · verse 36

This commentary was written by Claude (Anthropic); it carries no religious authority and should be checked against the classical sources.

78/36

جَزَآءً مِّن رَّبِّكَ عَطَآءً حِسَابًا

Jazāʾan min rabbika ʿaṭāʾan ḥisābā "A recompense from your Lord, a gift sufficient."

Three words, three layers

The verse gathers everything counted in the preceding five verses into a single sentence and qualifies it with three words.

جَزَآءً — recompense. The same word occurred in the twenty-sixth verse: jazāʾan wifāqā. The sūra, that is, names the ends of both groups "recompense".

مِّن رَّبِّكَ — from your Lord. And here two things happen at once.

One — the source is stated. On the side of punishment this note was absent. As was recorded above, this is an asymmetry: the reward is given with the giver named.

Two — the address changes. Up to this point the sūra was saying "you" (plural) or "they". Here it suddenly says "your Lord" — that is, to a single addressee, to the Prophet.

This is iltifāt and it was treated in the section on al-Qāriʿa. Its function here is this: in the middle of a long scene the narration stops and turns directly to one person. The scene is thereby confirmed through that person's eyes.

The choosing of the name رَبّ is meaningful too. As was recorded in the section on al-Fātiḥa, Rabb carries ownership and nurture together. What is given, that is, is presented not as a prize but as the outcome of a relation of care.

عَطَآءً — gift

Root: ع-ط-و. To give. أَعْطَىٰ — he gave. عَطَاء — a giving, a gift, a bestowal.

The choice of the word is critical. It had said jazāʾ (recompense); now the same thing is named ʿaṭāʾ (gift).

These two words are normally opposites:

جَزَاءعَطَاء
WhatThe paying of what is deservedWhat is given without return
Its measureAccording to the work doneAccording to the giver's generosity
A claim upon itYesNo

The verse sets the two side by side. The same thing, that is, is both a recompense and a gift.

The way the exegetes explain this joining is: the deed earns a share of the recompense, but what is given is far above what is earned. It begins, that is, as a recompense and ends as a gift.

And this is the same equation set up at al-Anʿām 6/160: "Whoever brings a good deed shall have ten like it; and whoever brings an evil deed is recompensed only with its like."

The two ends of the sūra are thereby completed:

  • 78/26: jazāʾan wifāqā — an equal recompense. Punishment only.
  • 78/36: jazāʾan … ʿaṭāʾan — recompense and gift.

One word on the side of punishment, two on the side of reward. Justice works on both sides; bounty on one only.

حِسَابًا — reckoned, or sufficient?

There is a disagreement over this word and it arises from the breadth of the root ح-س-ب.

In the section on al-Humaza it was recorded that this root carries two verbs: ḥasaba (he counted) and ḥasiba (he supposed). Now a third wing is added:

حَسْبto suffice, to be enough. Ḥasbuka — "it is enough for you". It is widespread in the Qurʾān:

"God is enough for us; what an excellent guardian." (Āl ʿImrān 3/173ḥasbunā'llāh)

"Whoever puts his trust in God, He is enough for him." (al-Ṭalāq 65/3fa-huwa ḥasbuh)

"God is enough for you." (al-Anfāl 8/62, 64 — ḥasbuka'llāh)

Now to the two readings in the verse:

ViewExplanationGround
Sufficient, abundantḤisāb here means "as much as suffices, satisfying"The ḥasb wing of the root; and it fits the word ʿaṭāʾ (gift) — a gift is given not by reckoning but abundantly
According to reckoningWhat is given has been calculated as the return for the deedThe ḥisāb wing of the root; it fits the word jazāʾ in the verse
Beyond reckoningOn one view the word is stretched to mean "not to be contained in a reckoning"Weak; the wording of the word does not give this

The first and second views deserve to be taken seriously, and what is interesting is this: they are exact opposites of one another. One says "measured out", the other "amply, in plenty".

I do not impose a preference. But I record this: since the verse sets two words side by side (jazāʾ and ʿaṭāʾ), that the third word too should be able to carry both directions at once fits the balance of the text. The recompense side requires reckoning, the gift side sufficiency.

The link within the sūra: two حِسَاب

And now to one of the sharpest links in the sūra.

VerseExpressionFor whom
78/27kānū lā yarjūna حِسَابًاThe transgressors — they were not expecting a reckoning
78/36ʿaṭāʾan حِسَابًاThose who guard themselves — a reckoned/sufficient gift

The same word, in the description of the two groups.

The return for the one who does not expect the reckoning is the reckoning he did not expect. The return for the one who does expect it is a gift that goes beyond reckoning.

I record this as an observation; the repetition of the word is a verifiable datum. The meaning the link sets up, however, is my own reading.


Roots analysed in this section

ح-س-ب

The whole of Sūrat al-Nabaʾ