Tafsir LabMethodGitHubTürkçe

al-Nūr 24:23

The Qurʾān · Sūra 24: al-Nūr · verse 23

This commentary was written by Claude (Anthropic); it carries no religious authority and should be checked against the classical sources.

24/23

إِنَّ ٱلَّذِينَ يَرْمُونَ ٱلْمُحْصَنَٰتِ ٱلْغَٰفِلَٰتِ ٱلْمُؤْمِنَٰتِ لُعِنُوا۟ فِى ٱلدُّنْيَا وَٱلْءَاخِرَةِ وَلَهُمْ عَذَابٌ عَظِيمٌ

Inna'lladhīna yarmūna'l-muḥṣanāti'l-ghāfilāti'l-muʾmināti luʿinū fi'l-dunyā wa'l-ākhirati wa lahum ʿadhābun ʿaẓīm

"Those who cast a charge at chaste, unsuspecting, believing women are cursed in this world and in the hereafter; and for them there is a great punishment."

Three attributes

The verse names the party slandered with three attributes, and all three are worth recording.

AttributeRootIts senseWhat it looks at
ٱلْمُحْصَنَاتح-ص-نProtected — like a fortressThe actual condition
ٱلْغَٰفِلَاتغ-ف-لUnsuspecting, to whom it never even occurredThe state of mind
ٱلْمُؤْمِنَاتأ-م-نBelievingThe condition in belief

The second attribute is one of the most affecting words in the sūra and deserves separate treatment.

ٱلْغَٰفِلَٰت — those who are unaware

Root: غ-ف-ل. Its concrete sense is to be unaware of a thing, not to hold it in mind, to have it escape one's notice. Ghafla — inattention; ghufl — bearing no mark upon it, unbranded (used of a piece of land or of a camel).

The second sense of the root is interesting: ghufl is what bears no trace or mark upon it. An unbranded camel, a stretch of land with no track across it. At the centre of the word, then, there is also the idea of "bearing no mark".

And in the verse's context this builds a picture: the party slandered is the party upon whom there is no mark at all. And slander is an attempt to set a mark where there is none.

I record this as my own reading; the second sense of the root is a usage the lexicographers record.

And the attribute has another side: ghāfilāt means "those to whom such a thing never even occurred". The attribute conveys, that is, not only that the act was not done but that there was not even a thought of it in the mind.

This sense of the word is widely recorded in the classical commentaries.

لُعِنُوا۟ — the passive voice

The verb is passive: luʿinū — "they are cursed". Its agent is not named.

And the tense is perfect. The ruling is announced not as something to be given in the future but as already given.

The root ل-ع-ن occurred in the sixth and seventh verses in the discussion of liʿān: laʿnatu'llāhi ʿalayh. The same word, in two different places:

VerseWho says itUpon whom
7A man — about himself, on a conditionUpon himself, if he is lying
23The text — as a rulingUpon those who cast the charge

What a man calls down upon himself conditionally in the seventh verse is announced as a ruling in the twenty-third. This is an observation about the word order, and the places of the words stand in the text.

The difference from the fourth verse

The verse repeats the verb of the fourth (yarmūn) but announces a different outcome:

24/424/23
Verbyarmūna'l-muḥṣanātyarmūna'l-muḥṣanāti'l-ghāfilāti'l-muʾmināt
OutcomeA worldly sanction — eighty strokes, the rejection of testimonyA ruling of the hereafter — a curse, a great punishment
ConditionThe failure to bring four witnesses
A note of repentancePresent (24/5)

The two verses give the counterpart of the same act on two different planes. And the increase in the attributes (three of them) shows that the second verse takes as its subject a narrower case — the case in which innocence is certain.

I record this as an observation about the word order.


The whole of Sūrat al-Nūr