Tafsir LabMethodGitHubTürkçe

al-Raḥmān 55:22

The Qurʾān · Sūra 55: al-Raḥmān · verse 22

This commentary was written by Claude (Anthropic); it carries no religious authority and should be checked against the classical sources.

55/22

يَخْرُجُ مِنْهُمَا ٱللُّؤْلُؤُ وَٱلْمَرْجَانُ

Yakhruju minhuma'l-luʾluʾu wa'l-marjān

"From the two come forth pearl and coral."

A section of one verse. And the benefit of the two seas is stated here.

مِنْهُمَا — "from the two"

And this word has raised a question in the classical commentaries: pearl and coral come out of salt water; they do not come out of fresh water. Yet the verse says "from the two".

The answers given in the classical sources:

AnswerWhat it says
Ascription to the wholeIn Arabic a thing may be ascribed to a whole by a property belonging to its part. To say "it comes out of the two seas" is to say "it comes out of the water the two seas make up"
The meeting pointThe extraction is done in the zone where the two waters meet; it therefore counts as coming out of both
Pearls are found in fresh water tooIt is recorded that some freshwater shellfish produce pearls

And the Qurʾān itself touches on this matter:

"Yet from each of them you eat fresh meat and bring out ornaments to wear." (Fāṭir 35/12) — wa min kullin taʾkulūna laḥman ṭariyyan wa tastakhrijūna ḥilyatan talbasūnahā

The verse of Fāṭir uses the same expression: min kullin — "from each". The Qurʾān's own usage is thus consistent, and the matter is a choice of word order, not an error of fact.

I do not impose a preference. The first answer is the soundest, since it rests on a settled usage in Arabic.

ٱللُّؤْلُؤ — pearl

The lexicographers do not speak with certainty about the origin of the word. It occurs in several places in the Qurʾān and almost every time in a context of ornament.

And there is a nicety in the place of the word in this verse: the pearl is the one thing coming out of the sea that is not eaten. In the preceding group of verses rayḥān (scent) did the same work: an item beyond need enters the list.

The sūra, that is, does not define a favour as "a thing that is useful".

ٱلْمَرْجَان — coral

The origin of the word is disputed. Some lexicographers say it entered Arabic from outside; others count it Arabic. I do not speak with certainty.

Two views are recorded about its meaning as well:

ViewSense
CoralThe red, branching growth in the sea
Small pearlLuʾluʾ the large pearl, marjān the small one

Both are transmitted and I do not impose a preference. The second view takes the occurrence of the two words in the same sentence as a gradation; the first takes them as two distinct objects.

A note on sound. The word begins with the same consonants as the verb three verses earlier (maraja): م-ر-ج. I do not claim that there is an etymological link between them — the origin of the word is disputed in any case. But the repetition of the sound is something audible in the text: maraja'l-baḥraynal-marjān. I record this as an observation about the sound.

And an internal ring: the word marjān will come once more in the sūra, at verse 58 — ka-annahunna'l-yāqūtu wa'l-marjān. What comes out of the sea returns in the description of the garden as a comparison.


The whole of Sūrat al-Raḥmān